Friday, April 1, 2011

Flog or dismount?

I did not write the following list, but it certainly applies to some situations. In times of high demands/expectations and resource declines, this silly list imparts a sort of off center wisdom.

Flogging A Dead Horse ?

The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed from generation to generation, says that when you discover you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. However, in modern business, other strategies are often tried with dead horses, including some of the following:

01. Buy a bigger whip.
02. Change riders.
03. Threaten the horse with termination.
04. Appoint a committee to study the horse.
05. Arrange to visit other sites to see how they ride dead horses.
06. Lower the standards so that dead horses can be included.
07. Reclassify the dead horse as "living impaired".
08. Hire an outside contractor to ride the dead horse.
09. Harness several dead horses together to increase speed.
10. Provide additional funding to increase the dead horse's performance.
11. Conduct a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse's performance.
12. Declare that the dead horse carries lower overhead, and therefore performs better
than some other horses.
13. Rewrite the expected performance parameters for all horses to accommodate the dead one.
14. Promote the dead horse to a supervisory position.




I've been pondering the real wisdom in dismounting. The hard part sometimes is recognizing and accepting that some horses are, in fact, dead. As educators, we can not give up on kids, but we can discover that certain programs or processes are just not working--essentially, dead. We also may discover that what is not working for us may respond for someone else.

Changing metaphors, sometimes I need to remind myself that key to being an effective leader is in the refrain of a Kenny Rogers song:
You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.

Sometimes success is in walking away and not trying to flog our dead horse.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

TRUST and RELATIONSHIPS

During the early sessions in my Educational Administration courses I write two words on the whiteboard—Trust and Relationships. Through the courses I frequently refer back to where those words were written as those two words are key to the success of a school.
Years ago I was an assistant superintendent of a K-12 district. We were implementing a program that was not wildly popular initially. A major reason for the implementation was the financial benefits that would allow smaller class sizes. A faculty team had met with administration and agreed it was the way to go, yet selling the concept was not easy. It required change! We were having a panel discussion before a large group including parents, teachers, staff, et al.
I presented some numbers that suggested why the change would be beneficial. A teacher disagreed, saying she had seen figures that were different. She was a strong voice and had significant parental support. Fortunately, a question was asked and attention moved to another panelist. Joyce was in the front row. I quietly told her these were new figures and I was familiar with what she was citing. She asked where the actual state document was that showed this information. It was back in my office several blocks away. She said she had to question my figures without that documentation. I asked, “Have I ever lied to you?” She shook her head. “I’m certainly not going to start now Joyce.” She thought for a few seconds, nodded and then said, “OK, but I would like to see that document tomorrow.” I assured her I would make a copy and the next day I took it to her.
Trust and relationship! These are major keys to success or failure for a leader.
Megan Tschannen-Moran, Ph.D., teaches educational administration at the College of William and Mary. She has been a principal and a researcher for many years. Trust is one of her major research areas. Her book and articles give strong support to the concept that trust is essential for school success. Here is a summary of her views on trust:

Five Facets of Trust
Each of these facets of trust affect all interpersonal relationships including those between the adults in a school environment, and these relationships can affect the successful functioning of that school.
• Vulnerability is essential to trust because trust is only an issue in relationships of interdependence in which one party relies on another for something they care about or need. Vulnerability creates the potential for betrayal or harm if one party does not live up to the expectations of the other.
• Benevolence is the confidence that “one can count on the good will of another to act in one’s best interest” (p.19). In other words, in a trusting relationship, you can assume that the other party would not willingly act a way to cause you harm.
• Honesty refers to a person’s character, integrity and authenticity. People are perceived to be honest through their actions, such as sharing truthful information or consistently following through on promise.
• Openness refers to the process through which people share information, influence and control. These can symbolize power within a relationship, and it is how this power is used than can influence trust.
• Reliability is the sense that one person is able to depend on another, and that behaviors will be predictable from situation to situation.

From http://api.ning.com/files/Ibb1luuy5jfR2u2j19xgeS-2hKkky*BH3ohxeovthL8TcoVAbDVSxiAatLg0V1PerVrITme3vPiRUvbcVzPrWdvKd2cIcbkl/MeganTschannenMoranFiveFacetsofTrust.pdf

Trust is part of ethics. In earlier blog posts I discuss Ethical Decision Making for Educational Leaders, Reflections on ethics and teacher reviews, The"Popular 8th Grader" as Principal, and in another Fair Hiring Practices. All of these posts deal with ethics and trust.

More from Dr. Tschannen-Moran:
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2000). Ties that bind: the importance of trust in schools. Essentially Yours: Coalition News for Ohio Schools.
A PowerPoint presented recently by Dr. Tschannen-Moran Cultivating Trust A Key Resource for School Success is posted at: http://www.leadershipk12.richmond.edu/document/resource/cultivating_trust.ppt

Monday, February 28, 2011

Fair Hiring Practices

Growing Trust and Relationships?

Many years ago, I would check out candidates for positions by calling people I knew would be straight with me about those individuals. A couple of times I received information that caused me to mark someone off the finalist list. Generally I was pleased to hear the individual had presented himself or herself with a best foot forward, of course, yet the whole package was positive. Today, that practice would be frowned upon—or even considered unethical.

The external candidate cannot be fully vetted, yet the internal candidate has a history. In some quarters, even when that history includes substantive sacrifices for the organization, support of the mission to the exclusion or suppression of personal gain, and a collaborative spirit about the job and organization, the positive history is not considered due to the “fairness” issue. Any negative history or personal antipathy for the person, even unrelated to job performance, comes to the fore.

Hidden issues come up with the internal candidate such as political correctness, age, with whom the candidate is allied (or not), being too willing to go the extra mile, personal dislikes or vendettas against the individual, and more. I watched an internal candidate deserving of a position—he had served in it for over a year—pushed aside without an interview. The subsequent hire was a disaster, and a costly one in time, money, and destruction of credibility. Yet, when the job was open again, that internal candidate was not considered, despite his knowledge and understanding of what was needed.

Equally problematic may be only hiring from within and not seeking the opportunity to gain new ideas. Balance is needed, but care must be taken to assure internal candidates are not routinely discriminated against or encouraged to apply for positions for which they will not be considered.

In teaching leadership to prospective school administrators I stress two words that represent a large portion of what makes leaders successful—TRUST and RELATIONSHIPS. In the school “business” we are building people—Learners who are reflective, collaborative, creative people. Leaders do not need to be liked, but they do need to develop relationships based in respect and trust for the mission of the school to go forward. Improving student learning, for example, is not done by a mere memo being sent to the classroom minions. What does this have to do with fair hiring? A lot!

Recently a school district administrative employee—one who went above and beyond consistently—was encouraged to apply for a position. Well qualified with degrees and credentials beyond the requirements for the post, the individual did so only to find rejection and evidence suggesting there was never any real consideration of her/his application. This situation is repeated all too often, destroying trust and relationships that could build the organization. Is it any wonder that organization is filled with strife? Further, is it any wonder that this district has several key players looking for positions elsewhere? (I write without concern that anyone might identify the district as I have heard the same story from several districts over the last few months.)

Langston Hughes wrote a poem that initially was only applied to the circumstances of African-Americans encouraged to dream and then having their hopes dashed. Hughes is a mainstream American poet! Poems apply to universal experience. Read Hughes’ poem and think about students, job applicants, and others encouraged to dream their dreams, only to have their dreams crushed by their encouragers.

Raisin in the Sun--Langston Hughes

What happens to a dream deferred?

Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?

Or fester like a sore--
And then run?

Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over--
like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.

Or does it explode?

Administrators need to focus on developing fairness that really is fair, not just an illusion. Trust and relationships encourage success in business, in families, and even in schools.

Administrator or Teacher needing a document camera?

Document cameras are so useful for school administrators, teachers and other presenters. Classrooms, staff meetings, conferences, sharing at a faculty PLC (professional learning community)—all great places to use a document camera. There are some great doc cameras available. AVerVision, Dukane, Elmo, and Wolfvision are the leaders. These terrific tools cost around $600 or more. And, you would not carry one to an off-site conference or meeting. Without money and the need (or desire) to use such a tool, what can you do?

An HD quality web camera can do the job. Mine already has a gooseneck, so I just need a stable base. Generally, these cameras have some fine tuning—or they can be adjusted using the gooseneck. Lighting generally is not an issue, but even a small flashlight can work when using the camera on the fly. Check out this “make your own” method.
http://friedtechnology.blogspot.com/2010/03/update-document-camera-under-100-now.html

Uses?

• Show a page in a document
• Zoom in on test scores
• Project an object such as a crystal or even school contraband
• Display student work
• Share a diagram
• Create a chart
• Show examples

Most of the cameras allow saving a picture of the view. Great for creating handouts and follow ups.

Have doc cam, will travel!

Sunday, April 12, 2009

The"Popular 8th Grader" as Principal

Creative Commons License
Popular 8th Grader as Principal by Penelope Swenson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

=================
Years ago, I was an assistant principal of a junior high school. Most kids liked me. They often asked me to join in games at lunch or talk with them as I moved about the campus. When I entered a classroom, however, the kids were quiet, waiting for the sign. Was I there to nab a culprit? Did I have an announcement? When I whispered to the teacher, “Just stopping by,” the students ceased to pay attention to me. I was part of the school milieu, but in their classroom, the teacher was in charge. Most of the kids knew me as an adult who cared about them, yet they did not mistake me for their peer.

Increasingly, we are seeing what one highly regarded secondary teacher I know calls “the popular 8th grader” as principal or assistant principal. When he or she enters the classroom, there are call outs of “Hey Ms. J” and “Yo Mr. Jerry” instead of quiet. This type of administrator responds approvingly to the calls from the students. The teacher’s lesson is disrupted and difficult to get back on track.

When a student is sent to the office of Ms. J or Mr. Jerry by a teacher using the referral process, the discipline often is limited to “Hey, you know Ms. Adams is uptight. Just stay out of her way.” The student is sent back to class it is as if nothing happened, because no discipline did happen. The student knows Ms. Adams is not respected by Mr. Jerry. Ms. Adams, who had already given that student three short classroom detentions for his disruptive burping, inappropriate classroom language, and acting out, also knows she is not respected by Mr. Jerry.

Opportunities are lost. Mr. Jerry (or the equal opportunity Ms. J) may even mention how teachers should be friends with their students. Mr. Jerry prides himself on being ‘buds’ with the kids. A gulf is established with the teachers as they know they are frequently seen as the problem, not a major part of the solution. (Sure, there are poor teachers and inexperienced teachers. There are even teachers who may be “the” problem. BUT, teachers are the greatest resource in the school for improving student learning. They must be a huge part of any solution in school improvement.)

A recent conversation with a highly successful principal of what many would classify as a large, difficult secondary school, the principal noted, “I’m there for the kids, but I’m not their friend or peer. That is not what they need. They can count on me to do what is best for them, yet they know I am an adult, not their buddy.” She went on to say she worries about those buddy principals as they are not fulfilling their responsibilities to the students, faculty, and parents.

A young teacher with one of the buddy duos of principal and assistant principal was told he must keep a student in his classroom who repeatedly had made threats toward him and others in the class. There was no disciplinary action taken, other than the student telling the AP that she would be good. The student was in the office because she used the word “kill” and derogatory language, both in graffiti and verbally, toward the teacher on multiple occasions, yet she did not even need to apologize to that teacher. When she reentered his classroom after her office visit, she smirked and showed no concern about “being good” as she started immediately to make inappropriate comments.

In this case, the teacher did not feel supported and he did not feel safe. He noted that few students felt safe, particularly those who had tried to help and even protect him. He questioned how he could teach his large classes without a sense of safety for himself and his students. Ultimately, he quit.

If the situation in the earlier paragraphs were just one teacher having such an issue, we might look at the teacher as the problem. In that same school, however, numerous teachers reflected that they had similar problems and no support. One said she would quit if she were not the sole support of her family. None of those teachers believed there was any administrator with whom they could speak about the problems they faced.

This is not a difficulty with only that school. Similar stories are being told throughout California and across the nation. In an article from the American School Board Journal (Alford, 2008), a survey reports teachers are most concerned about Leadership, empowerment, facilities and resources, time, and professional development. The author notes there is a substantial gap between the administrators and teachers when reviewing critical aspects of the work environment:

• 97% of principals agreed that leadership was an issue being adequately addressed; only 57% of teachers agreed.
• 97% of principals felt that teachers were being empowered; only 57% of teachers agreed.
• 96% of principals believed that teachers were involved in decision making; 51% of teachers agreed (Alford, 2008).


Alford gives the results of another survey wherein 74% of the teachers believed they could not speak freely without fear of repercussions. Poor leadership negates teamwork. Poor leadership condemns the students to mediocrity or worse.

There are many surveys of what teachers, parents, and communities want in principals. None of them offer “the popular 8th grader” as principal or assistant principal as a solution to school problems.

In an article on MiddleWeb.com, Anne Jolly, who has worked with many middle grades principals, writes:

Without considering restrainers on principals in terms of time, funding, office staff, central office expectations, etc., I'd start the list with these four characteristics:

Real Principals. . .
Value their teachers as competent professionals. They avoid paternalism. They listen to their teachers. In their schools, the responsibilities they assign teachers reflect teacher's professional status and their primary mission of facilitating student learning.

Value their teachers as leaders. They avoid "cosmetic empowerment." When they ask teachers for input, they actually use that input to make real changes. Real principals give their teachers business cards. They encourage teachers to explore their own areas of strength as leaders, whether they prefer to be community leaders, school leaders, classroom leaders, or all three. They encourage their teachers to take risks without fear of penalty for failure.

Value themselves as the professional leaders they are. They avoid being "rule-driven." They deal consistently and fairly with students, parents, and teachers. They understand that real principals make mistakes, and they are honest with themselves about their strengths about areas for improvement.

Real principals turn their schools into learning communities. They believe that each individual in the school - staff or student - can achieve great things, and they expect no less (Jolly, n.d.).


In these times, just as in the past, we need principals who are persons of integrity, who respect and value the teachers, the staff, the students, and the parents. When school improvement happens, it is not on the shoulders of the principal alone. Those “popular 8th graders” as principals are ones who lose great faculty to other schools and who develop schools with rifts and divisions at a time when all need to be working together for the students.

Anne Jolly’s words echo loudly as we ponder how to improve our schools.

Resources:

Alford, D. (2008, September). What do teachers want? American School Board Journal.

DuFour, R. (2002). Beyond instructional leadership : The learning-centered principal. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12-15.

Jolly, A. (2008). Team to Teach: A Facilitator's guide to professional learning teams. National Staff Development Council.

Occupational Outlook Handbook (2008-09). Education Administrators. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved April 10, 2009 from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos007.htm .

Websites:

All Things PLC http://www.allthingsplc.org/ (This is a huge resource. Check the reference list.)

What makes a good middle grades principal http://www.middleweb.com/MWLISTCONT/MSLprincipals.html

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Looking for data

Hi, I'm looking for a current comparison of days in school for various nations. If you have a source, please share. Here is what I have thus far, but the current numbers may not all be accurate.

The 1990 numbers are from an article in the Atlantic Monthly. It is found at http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/educatio/barr2f.htm


Thanks for checking.

School year length

Nation 1990

Japan 243

Germany 266-240 (West)

South Korea 220

Israel 216

Luxembourg 216

Soviet Union 211

Netherlands 200

Scotland 200

Thailand 200

Hong Kong 195

England/Wales 192

Hungary 192

Switzerland 191

Finland 190

New Zealand 190

Nigeria 190

British Columbia 185

France 185

Ontario 185

Ireland 184

New Brunswick 182

Quebec 180

Spain 180

Sweden 180

United States 180

French Belgium 175

Flemish Belgium 160

-


(recent below)

Brazil 200 minimum req

Canada 190 min

Philippines 200 min

South Africa 200

Scotland 190 min

Japan 240